Changes in Use and Access to Care for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) are vulnerable to health care disruption, and policies were adopted to mitigate COVID-19-related disruptions. We compare CYSHCN use of and access to care in 2019 to 2020. METHOD: Using the National Survey of Children's Health, we identified CYSHCN and assessed differences in health care use, unmet health care needs, frustrations accessing care, and barriers to care using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The final sample included 17,065 CYSHCN. In the fully adjusted analysis, there was a significant decrease in odds of accessing preventive dental care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.63; 95%confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.77) and increased odds of unmet mental health care needs (AOR,1.34; 95% CI, 1.02-1.77). The inability to obtain an appointment was a barrier that increased during the study period (AOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.71-4.46). DISCUSSION: Novel pandemic related policies may have mitigated negative impacts on health care access for CYSHCN.

Reconsidering the role of place in health and welfare services: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and Canada.

Places-the meaningful locations of daily life-have been central to the wellbeing of humans since they first formed social groups, providing a stable base for individuals, families, and communities. In the United States and Canada, as elsewhere, place also plays a foundational role in the provision of critical social and health services and resources. Yet the globally destabilizing events of the COVID-19 pandemic have dramatically challenged the concept, experience, and meaning of place. Place-centered public health measures such as lockdowns and stay-at-home orders have disrupted and transformed homes, neighborhoods, workplaces, and schools. These measures stressed families and communities, particularly among marginalized groups, and made the delivery of vital resources and services more difficult. At the same time, the pandemic has stimulated a range of creative and resilient responses. Building from an overview of these effects and drawing conceptually on theories of people-place relationships, this paper argues for critical attention to reconsidering and re-envisioning prevailing assumptions about place-centric policies, services, and practices. Such reappraisal is vital to ensuring that, going forward, scholars, policymakers, and practitioners can effectively design and deliver services capable of maintaining social connections, safety, and wellbeing in contexts of uncertainty, inequality, and flux.

COVID-19, Social Determinants Past, Present, and Future, and African Americans' Health.

As the COVID-19 pandemic progresses, more African Americans than whites are falling ill and dying from the virus and more are losing livelihoods from the accompanying recession. The virus thereby exploits structural disadvantages, rooted partly in historical and contemporary anti-Black sentiments, working against African Americans. These include higher rates of comorbid illness and more limited health care access, higher rates of disadvantageous labor market positioning and community and housing conditions, greater exposure to long-term care residence, and higher incarceration rates. COVID-19 also exposes African Americans' greater vulnerability to recession, and possibly greater susceptibility to accompanying behavioral health problems. If they are left unaddressed, the very vulnerabilities COVID-19 exploits may perpetuate themselves. However, continuing and supplementing health and economic COVID mitigation policies can disproportionately benefit African Americans and reduce short- and long-term adverse effects. The greater impact of COVID-19 on African Americans demonstrates the consequences of pervasive social and economic inequality and marks this as a critical time to prevent further compounding of adverse effects.